Trichomonas Vaginalis Infection and Cancer

The literature retrieval databases mainly included PubMed database, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE medical literature library, Web of Science, Science Direct and Google Scholar, and the literature search time was up to December 2021. The keywords searched by MeSH and commonly used for literature retrieval were used alone or in combination: “Trichomonas vaginalis”, “Trichomonas infections”, “Trichomoniasis”, “Trichomonas vaginitis”, “Neoplasms”, “cancer”, “neoplasia”, “carcinoma in situ”, “canceration” and “tumour” with “OR” and / or “AND” operators. The systematic search of literature was performed by two independent researchers. The retrieved articles were manually checked the title, abstract and full-text by two independent researchers, and the irrelevant articles and duplicate were removed. The retained articles were categorized as epidemiological investigations, reviews, and research articles. This systematic review with meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO, https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero) and a registration ID was assigned (CRD42022340263).

Free full text: Click here

Zhang Z., Li D., Li Y., Zhang R., Xie X., Yao Y., Zhao L., Tian X., Yang Z., Wang S., Yue X, & Mei X. (2023). The correlation between Trichomonas vaginalis infection and reproductive system cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Infectious Agents and Cancer, 18, 15.

Publication 2023

Cancer Carcinoma in situ Trichomonas vaginalis Trichomonas vaginitis Trichomoniasis Tumour

Corresponding Organization :

Other organizations : Xinxiang Medical University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Search databases: PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, Google Scholar
Search keywords: "Trichomonas vaginalis", "Trichomonas infections", "Trichomoniasis", "Trichomonas vaginitis", "Neoplasms", "cancer", "neoplasia", "carcinoma in situ", "canceration", "tumour"

dependent variables

Articles retrieved and included in the systematic review and meta-analysis

control variables

Search time: up to December 2021
Literature screening and selection process: Two independent researchers reviewed the title, abstract, and full-text of retrieved articles, and removed irrelevant articles and duplicates

positive controls

Not explicitly mentioned

negative controls

Not explicitly mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!