The exposure lateral or mediolateral episiotomy was defined by a checkbox in the standardized maternal medical record marking a left‐ or right‐sided episiotomy. In total, 13 950 (31.2%) women had a lateral or mediolateral episiotomy and 30 706 (68.8%) had no episiotomy. Women with a midline (n = 209, 0.5%) or undefined type of episiotomy (with the procedure code TMA00 but no indication of side, n = 809, 1.8%) were excluded. The final cohort included 44 656 women with a lateral/mediolateral episiotomy or no episiotomy (Figure
Episiotomy Effects on Subsequent Birth
The exposure lateral or mediolateral episiotomy was defined by a checkbox in the standardized maternal medical record marking a left‐ or right‐sided episiotomy. In total, 13 950 (31.2%) women had a lateral or mediolateral episiotomy and 30 706 (68.8%) had no episiotomy. Women with a midline (n = 209, 0.5%) or undefined type of episiotomy (with the procedure code TMA00 but no indication of side, n = 809, 1.8%) were excluded. The final cohort included 44 656 women with a lateral/mediolateral episiotomy or no episiotomy (Figure
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Danderyds sjukhus
Other organizations : Stockholm University, Centre for Health Equity Studies, Karolinska University Hospital
Variable analysis
- Lateral or mediolateral episiotomy
- First and second births
- Live born, single neonates
- Born in cephalic presentation at gestational week 34 or later
- Without malformations (excluding all ICD‐10 Q‐diagnoses)
- Spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, forceps delivery or combined instrumental delivery in the first birth
- The independent variable is the use of lateral or mediolateral episiotomy, which was defined by a checkbox in the standardized maternal medical record.
- The dependent variable is the occurrence of first and second births, which were the outcomes measured in the study.
- The control variables were used to exclude common indications for prelabor cesarean delivery and ensure a sample of women with a first birth with vacuum extraction (VE).
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!