This study interrogates the effect of transient manipulation of tissue tension via ROCK inhibition on PC progression and response to Gem/Abraxane. In vitro organotypic and CDM experiments were performed in independent biological triplicates, with three technical replicates per repeat and per treatment group. For in vivo experiments, numbers of mice used for each model are outlined in corresponding figures and figure legends. In vivo priming started when tumor volume reached 180 mm3 (average size) or 7 × 105 photons/s (average IVIS signal). Mice for which tumor volume or IVIS signal was 10% lower or higher than the average value before enrollment were excluded from analysis. FLIM-FRET analysis of CDK1 and SRC activity in vitro was conducted in >30 cells per group in three independent biological repeats. In vivo analysis of CDK1 and SRC was performed in 80 cells per mouse, with measurements in three subcellular areas per cell to generate an average value for CDK1 specifically, whereas measurements of lifetime in the whole cell (one value per cell) were performed for analysis of SRC activity. IHC, SHG, picrosirius red, and GLCM analyses were conducted on three representative FOVs in organotypic matrices and CDMs and in five representative FOVs in subcutaneous xenograft and intrasplenic experiments. Metastatic burden, extravasation, and metastasis morphology in the liver were analyzed in serial sections (five sections per organ with a 100-μm step). Experimental end points for survival experiments were in compliance with Garvan Ethics Committee guidelines (13/17, 14/06, 14/11, and 16/13 protocols).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Vennin C., Chin V.T., Warren S.C., Lucas M.C., Herrmann D., Magenau A., Melenec P., Walters S.N., del Monte-Nieto G., Conway J.R., Nobis M., Allam A.H., McCloy R.A., Currey N., Pinese M., Boulghourjian A., Zaratzian A., Adam A.A., Heu C., Nagrial A.M., Chou A., Steinmann A., Drury A., Froio D., Giry-Laterriere M., Harris N.L., Phan T., Jain R., Weninger W., McGhee E.J., Whan R., Johns A.L., Samra J.S., Chantrill L., Gill A.J., Kohonen-Corish M., Harvey R.P., Biankin A.V., Jeffry Evans T.R., Anderson K.I., Grey S.T., Ormandy C.J., Gallego-Ortega D., Wang Y., Samuel M.S., Sansom O.J., Burgess A., Cox T.R., Morton J.P., Pajic M, & Timpson P. (2017). Transient tissue priming via ROCK inhibition uncouples pancreatic cancer progression, sensitivity to chemotherapy, and metastasis. Science translational medicine, 9(384), eaai8504.
Other organizations :
The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, UNSW Sydney, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St Vincent's Clinic, Victor Chang Cardiac Research Institute, ARC Centre of Excellence in Advanced Molecular Imaging, St Vincent's Hospital Sydney, University of Wollongong, Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute, Centenary Institute, University of Sydney, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Cancer Research UK Scotland Institute, Royal North Shore Hospital, Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Western Sydney University, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, University of California, San Diego, South Australia Pathology, University of Adelaide, Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia
Transient manipulation of tissue tension via ROCK inhibition
dependent variables
PC progression
Response to Gem/Abraxane
CDK1 activity
SRC activity
Metastatic burden
Extravasation
Metastasis morphology in the liver
Survival
control variables
Organotypic and CDM experiments were performed in independent biological triplicates
Three technical replicates per repeat and per treatment group
Tumor volume or IVIS signal within 10% of the average value before enrollment
FLIM-FRET analysis of CDK1 and SRC activity in >30 cells per group in three independent biological repeats
In vivo analysis of CDK1 and SRC in 80 cells per mouse, with measurements in three subcellular areas per cell
IHC, SHG, picrosirius red, and GLCM analyses conducted on three representative FOVs in organotypic matrices and CDMs and in five representative FOVs in subcutaneous xenograft and intrasplenic experiments
Metastatic burden, extravasation, and metastasis morphology in the liver analyzed in serial sections (five sections per organ with a 100-μm step)
Experimental end points for survival experiments in compliance with Garvan Ethics Committee guidelines
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required