Four dependent variables were adapted from other physician surveys (6 (link)–8 (link)). To assess work and WLB satisfaction, respondents were asked to rate their overall satisfaction with work and WLB. To assess work stress, respondents were asked how often they feel stressed in a typical week. To assess their intention to leave their current position, respondents were asked the likelihood they would look for another job within the year. Each dependent variable was assessed on a 4- or 5-point Likert or modified-Likert-scaled item.
Protocol detail
Physician Work Satisfaction and Retention
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Columbia University
Top 5 similar protocols
Variable analysis
independent variables
- Independent variables not explicitly mentioned.
- Overall satisfaction with work
- Overall satisfaction with work-life balance (WLB)
- How often respondents feel stressed in a typical week
- Likelihood of looking for another job within the year
- Control variables not explicitly mentioned.
- No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned by the authors.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!