Fabrication of Dental Stone Model Samples
Variable analysis
- Undercut size: 0.25 mm and 0.50 mm
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Maxillary second molar (Dentona® Esthetic-Base® gold, Dentona AG, Dortmund, Germany)
- Occlusal rests (2.5 mm long, 2.5 mm wide, and 2 mm deep) placed mesially
- Silicon impression material (Dublisil, Dreve Den-tamid GmbH, Unna, Germany) used to duplicate the prepared molar models
- Resin material (RHINO ROOCK, DB Lab Supplies Limited) used to fabricate 42 molar models: 21 with a 0.25 mm undercut and 21 with a 0.50 mm undercut
- Positive control: Not mentioned
- Negative control: Not mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!