For these analyses, we collapsed breast stage 2 and breast stage 3 to contrast girls who were prepubertal (breast stage 1) from those who had breast development (breast stage ≥2), and contrasted pubic hair stage 1 from those with pubic hair stage ≥2. Maturation status was described at age 7 and 8 years, as described already. A given participant could have contributed to analyses at both ages 7 and 8 for age-specific maturation status. Logistic regression models were used to examine factors that are potentially related to breast stage (1 vs ≥2) as the outcome. The initial models included BMI percentile, race, age, and site, as well as all interaction terms of main effects with site. A final logistic regression model, derived from backward elimination, included only variables that were significant at a probability level of .05. Linear regression was used to estimate the strength of the relationship between height velocity and potential predictors, including age, race, breast stage, site, and all sites by main effect interactions. A backward elimination procedure was used to derive a final model with only significant main effects and site interactions. To assess interrater agreement for pubertal staging, 1 of the experts (Dr Galvez) visited each clinical site to perform maturation assessment in tandem with clinical staff. The degree of agreement between the master trainers and the research staff members who were conducting the examinations was measured in 127 dual examinations by using the κ statistic, which evaluates observed agreement contrasted to agreement that is attributable chance.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Other organizations :
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, Kaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, University of Cincinnati Medical Center, California Department of Public Health, Kaiser Permanente
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required