Molecular Cloning and Genetic Manipulation Protocols
Corresponding Organization : University of Oxford
Other organizations : North Dakota State University, Sainsbury Laboratory, University of Cambridge, Curtin University
Variable analysis
- Bacteria used in this study (Table S1)
- Plasmids (Table S2 and Data S2)
- Mobilization of plasmids into strains of interest via di‐parental mating with E. coli ST18
- Mini‐Tn7 integration into the chromosome of AcLP via tri‐parental matings to mobilize the transposase helper plasmid pTNS3
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Culture media: TY (Beringer, 1974) or UMS (Brown & Dilworth, 1975; Haskett, Paramasivan, et al., 2022b; Poole et al., 1994)
- Plasmid construction methods: HiFi assembly (New England Biolabs) or BEVA modular golden‐gate assembly (Geddes, Mendoza‐Suárez, & Poole, 2019a; Weber et al., 2011)
- Positive control: Not specified
- Negative control: Not specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!