Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software (version 9.3, Cary, NC). All P-values presented are two sided, and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant for all analyses. All ORBIT-AF study participants provided written informed consent prior to study entry. The ORBIT-AF Registry was approved by the Duke Institutional Review Board (IRB), and participating sites obtained approval from local IRBs as needed prior to entering patient data.
Evaluating stroke risk scores in AF
Statistical analysis was performed using SAS software (version 9.3, Cary, NC). All P-values presented are two sided, and P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant for all analyses. All ORBIT-AF study participants provided written informed consent prior to study entry. The ORBIT-AF Registry was approved by the Duke Institutional Review Board (IRB), and participating sites obtained approval from local IRBs as needed prior to entering patient data.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic in Arizona, Hofstra University, Jefferson College, Stanford University, Janssen (United States)
Protocol cited in 9 other protocols
Variable analysis
- ORBIT score
- HAS-BLED score
- ATRIA score
- Accuracy of ORBIT, HAS-BLED, and ATRIA scores in an external AF population, ROCKET-AF
- Patients in the ROCKET-AF trial, an international, randomized, double-blind, event-driven trial of 14,264 patients comparing rivaroxaban (20 mg daily) to dose-adjusted warfarin
- None mentioned
- None mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!