Consecutive patients with severe COVID‐19 admitted to Tongji Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan from January 1 to February 13, 2020, were retrospectively enrolled. Exclusion criteria were a bleeding diathesis, hospital stay < 7 days, lack of information about coagulation parameters and medications, and age < 18 years. A retrospective review of the characteristics of these patients was performed through the electronic medical record system of our hospital, the medications and outcomes (28‐day mortality) were monitored up to March 13, 2020. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Tongji Hospital (Wuhan, China). The diagnosis of COVID‐19 was according to World Health Organization interim guidance8 and confirmed by RNA detection of the SARS‐CoV‐2 in a clinical laboratory of the Tongji hospital. Severe COVID‐19 was defined as meeting any one of following items, according to the Diagnosis and Treatment Plan of COVID‐19 suggested by National Health Commission of China9 : Respiratory rate ≥30 breaths/min; arterial oxygen saturation ≤93% at rest; PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 300 mm Hg. The SIC score system including prothrombin time (PT), platelet count, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) was described in Table 1,6 (link) in which the SOFA score contained four items and was originally developed by an international group of experts to describe the time course of muitiple organ dysfunctions using a limited number of routinely measured variables.10 (link) Meanwhile, in our previous study,3 (link) higher D‐dimer and PT on admission were associated with poor prognosis in patients with COVID‐19. Hence these three parameters were included in this study and the results were recorded at the time the patient meeting the definition of severe COVID‐19. Anticoagulant treatment group was defined as receiving unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 7 days or longer,11 (link) which was the most commonly used anticoagulant therapy for COVID‐19 in our hospital.
ISTH SIC scoring system
Table 1
Item
Score
Range
Platelet count (×109/L)
1
100‐150
2
<100
PT‐INR
1
1.2‐1.4
2
>1.4
SOFA score
1
1
2
≥2
Total score for SIC
≥4
Abbreviations: INR, International Normalized Ratio; SOFA, sequential organ failure assessment.
The coagulation tests, including PT and D‐dimer, were detected using a STA‐R MAX coagulation analyzer and original reagents (Diagnostica Stago). The platelet counts were analyzed by a Sysmex XE‐2100 hematology analyzer (Sysmex). Normally and abnormally distributed quantitative variables were compared using the Student's t‐test and the Mann‐Whitney U test, respectively. Categorical variables were compared using the chi‐squared test. The results were given as the mean ± standard deviation, median (interquartile range), or number (percentage), wherever appropriate. Categorical and consecutive variables were evaluated by logistic regression analysis for their ability to predict 28‐day mortality. A P value of < .05 was considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using SPSS 21.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc).
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Tang N., Bai H., Chen X., Gong J., Li D, & Sun Z. (2020). Anticoagulant treatment is associated with decreased mortality in severe coronavirus disease 2019 patients with coagulopathy. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 18(5), 1094-1099.
Anticoagulant treatment group (receiving unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) for 7 days or longer)
dependent variables
28-day mortality
control variables
Prothrombin time (PT)
Platelet count
Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required