For each cell, two quality control metrics were calculated: (1) the total number of genes detected, and (2) the proportion of UMIs contributed by mitochondrially encoded transcripts. Cells in which fewer than 200 genes were detected and in which mitochondrially encoded transcripts constituted greater than 10% of the total library were excluded from downstream analysis. Genes detected in fewer than three cells across the dataset were also excluded, yielding an expression matrix of 9,194 cells by 13,642 genes (LCMV), 11,212 cells by 14,496 genes (day 10 + 20 tumor), or 4,313 cells by 13,880 genes (day 20 tumor). Each gene expression measurement was normalized by total expression in the corresponding cell and multiplied by a scaling factor of 10,000. Mean and dispersion values were calculated for each gene across all cells; 1,653 genes (LCMV), 1,234 genes (day 10 + 20 tumor) or 914 genes (day 20 tumor) classified as highly variable. Highly variable genes were used for PCA. Principal components were determined to be significant (P < 0.01) using the jackstraw method, and tSNE was performed on these significant principle components using default parameters for 1,000 iterations for visualization in two dimensions. Unsupervised clustering was performed using a shared nearest neighbor modularity optimization-based algorithm45 . Differential expression analysis was performed between each cluster and all other cells using a Wilcoxon rank sum test. Single-cell signature scoring using FastProject46 (v.0.9.2) was performed with a curated version of the C7 Immune Signatures database from MSigDB. Significance of signature enrichment in single-cell datasets of one cluster relative to other clusters was determined using a Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. FastProject signature scoring of CD8+ T cells from tumors was performed in the scope of transcriptional signatures derived from the subpopulations we identified in LCMV or from signatures derived from the literature. Tumor cells were plotted on a two-dimensional axis on the basis of their scores for the terminally exhausted and progenitor exhausted signatures on the x axis and y axis, respectively.
Single-cell RNA-seq analysis of exhausted CD8+ T cells
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Broad Institute
Protocol cited in 17 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Cell sorting: gp33-tetramer+ live CD8+PD-1+CD44+ cells from day-28 LCMV Cl13-infected mouse spleens
- Cell sorting: SIINFEKL-tetramer+ live CD45+CD8+ cells from day-20 B16-OVA tumors
- Cell sorting: live PD-1+CD44+CD45+CD8+ cells from day-10 B16-OVA tumors
- Single-cell RNA-seq transcriptome profiles
- Chromium Controller (10X Genomics) for a target recovery of 5,000 single cells
- Sequencing on an Illumina NextSeq500 sequencer using a 75-bp kit with paired-end reads
- Cell Ranger analysis pipeline (v.1.2) for sample demultiplexing, barcode processing, alignment, filtering, UMI counting and aggregation of sequencing runs
- Seurat package (v.2.1.0) for downstream analyses in R
- Quality control filters: cells with fewer than 200 genes detected and mitochondrially encoded transcripts constituting greater than 10% of the total library were excluded
- Genes detected in fewer than three cells across the dataset were also excluded
- Gene expression measurements were normalized by total expression in the corresponding cell and multiplied by a scaling factor of 10,000
- None specified
- None specified
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!