Three brain sections were analyzed for each rat. For quantification, three randomly selected high-power fields (HPFs; × 400 for IF study) were analyzed in each section. The mean number of positively stained cells per HPF for each animal was then determined by summation of all numbers divided by 9.
Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol for Rat Brain
Three brain sections were analyzed for each rat. For quantification, three randomly selected high-power fields (HPFs; × 400 for IF study) were analyzed in each section. The mean number of positively stained cells per HPF for each animal was then determined by summation of all numbers divided by 9.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, National Sun Yat-sen University, Asia University
Variable analysis
- Treatment with 3% H2O2 for 30 min
- Incubation with Immuno-Block reagent for 30 min at room temperature
- Incubation with primary antibodies against CD31, von Willebrand factor (vWF), NeuN, stromal cell-derived factor [(SDF)-1α, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), CXCR4, microglial cell, CD68, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) at 4 °C overnight
- Number of positively stained cells for each marker
- Rehydrated paraffin sections
- Use of Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies
- Counterstaining with DAPI
- Observation with a fluorescent microscope equipped with epifluorescence
- Three brain sections analyzed for each rat
- Three randomly selected high-power fields (HPFs, × 400) analyzed in each section
- Mean number of positively stained cells per HPF calculated for each animal
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!