Hospital factors collected included the hospital’s geographic region, licensed bed volume (<250, 250–499, ≥500 inpatient beds), and academic training program status (no training program, residency program only, residency and fellowship programs). Hospital process variables included the use of a hospitalwide cardiopulmonary arrest alert, use of an organized hospital code team, defibrillation time, time of cardiac arrest (work hours: 8
Racial Disparities in Cardiac Arrest Outcomes
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Saint Luke's Hospital
Protocol cited in 6 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Patient race
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Patient age
- Patient sex
- Initial cardiac rhythm
- Comorbidities or medical conditions (congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, renal/hepatic/respiratory insufficiency, central nervous system depression, acute stroke, pneumonia, hypotension, sepsis, major trauma, requirement for hemodialysis)
- Hospital's geographic region
- Hospital licensed bed volume (<250, 250–499, ≥500 inpatient beds)
- Hospital academic training program status (no training program, residency program only, residency and fellowship programs)
- Use of a hospitalwide cardiopulmonary arrest alert
- Use of an organized hospital code team
- Defibrillation time
- Time of cardiac arrest (work hours: 8 am to 5 pm; after hours: 5 pm to 8 am or weekend)
- Cardiac arrest location (not monitored, telemetry, or intensive care unit [ICU])
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!