The Nordic questionnaire of back pain [19 (link)], adjusted for sport specific settings [20 (link)], was used to examine the lifetime and one-year prevalence of thoracolumbar back pain as well as training volume of the participants. The Nordic questionnaire of back pain has shown acceptable test–retest reliability and validity to clinical examination [19 (link), 20 (link)]. Based on the sport adjusted Nordic questionnaire, questions focusing on training volume between 10 and 20 years of age were computed, since athletes are plausibly more susceptible to develop radiographic spinal changes of the spine during the growth spurt [13 (link), 21 (link)]. The Oswestry back pain disability index [22 (link)] was used to examine disability associated to thoracic and lumbar back pain.
Evaluating Back Pain in Climbers
The Nordic questionnaire of back pain [19 (link)], adjusted for sport specific settings [20 (link)], was used to examine the lifetime and one-year prevalence of thoracolumbar back pain as well as training volume of the participants. The Nordic questionnaire of back pain has shown acceptable test–retest reliability and validity to clinical examination [19 (link), 20 (link)]. Based on the sport adjusted Nordic questionnaire, questions focusing on training volume between 10 and 20 years of age were computed, since athletes are plausibly more susceptible to develop radiographic spinal changes of the spine during the growth spurt [13 (link), 21 (link)]. The Oswestry back pain disability index [22 (link)] was used to examine disability associated to thoracic and lumbar back pain.
Corresponding Organization : University of Gothenburg
Other organizations : Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Variable analysis
- Climbing level for the last 12 months
- Prevalence of jumping descent in bouldering
- Body Mass Index (BMI)
- Lifetime and one-year prevalence of thoracolumbar back pain
- Training volume of the participants
- Disability associated with thoracic and lumbar back pain
- Weight and height of participants
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!