Retrospective Study of Zoster-Associated Pain

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Republic of Korea (No. 4-2022-0819). As it is a retrospective observational study, the requirement for obtaining informed consent from the patients was waived. This manuscript complies with the STROBE checklists applicable to observational studies. Adult patients who complained of zoster-associated pain at their first visit from January 2016 to August 2021 were enrolled. Patients with incomplete medical records or those who did not complete the painDETECT questionnaire were excluded.

Free full text: Click here

Kim H.J., Yoon K.B., Kang M., Yang Y.S, & Kim S.H. (2023). Subgrouping patients with zoster-associated pain according to sensory symptom profiles: A cluster analysis. Frontiers in Neurology, 14, 1137453.

Publication 2023

Adult Institutional review board Pain Patients Zoster

Corresponding Organization : Yonsei University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Independent variables not explicitly mentioned.

dependent variables

Zoster-associated pain

control variables

Control variables not explicitly mentioned.

controls

As this is a retrospective observational study, no positive or negative controls were specified.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!