Genetic Insights from Transplant Cohorts
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Hennepin County Medical Center
Protocol cited in 7 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Independent variables not explicitly mentioned.
- Dependent variables not explicitly mentioned.
- The studies have a wide geographic representation across the United States, The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Ireland, Spain, and Australia.
- The majority of transplant recipients in the studies are adults, with the exception of 2 cohorts, which comprise approximately 1060 pediatric subjects.
- The study designs are primarily single or multisite prospective cohorts, and although a small number are retrospective in recruitment approach, most are continuing to accrue longitudinal transplant phenotypes and outcome events.
- Approximately 18900 samples were subjected to GWAS using a transplant-specific genomewide genotyping array, and approximately 8600 additional samples genotyped using conventional GWAS arrays.
- The iGeneTRAiN studies range in size from less than 100 D-R pairs to several thousands of recipients.
- All kidney studies and 2 liver studies have varied proportions of living donor versus deceased donors.
- Approximately 81.3%, 12.1%, 1.7%, and 4% of the 16494 recipients are of European, African, Asian, and Hispanic ancestry, respectively, with the remainder classified as 'other'.
- Approximately 62% of D-R pairs have conventional 2- or 4-digit HLA typing available.
- No positive controls specified.
- No negative controls specified.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!