During testing, subjects were seated in a sound-treated booth. Sentences were presented at 60 dB SPL in the sound field from a single loudspeaker at 0 degrees azimuth on the horizontal axis. Subjects were instructed to repeat back each sentence and to guess when unsure of any word. Prior to testing, subjects completed a practice list of 50 sentences that were not included in the 33 lists. Following completion of each block of sentence lists, subjects were asked to exit the sound booth and relax for a minimum of 15 minutes. Each sentence was scored as the number of words repeated correctly and a percent correct score was calculated for each list.
Validation of Sentence Lists for Cochlear Implant Users
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Arizona State University
Other organizations : Vanderbilt University, The University of Texas at Dallas
Protocol cited in 56 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Sentence list order (randomized for each subject)
- Percent correct score for each sentence list
- Number of words repeated correctly for each sentence
- Monosyllabic word scores of participants (36% to 88% correct, avg = 61%, s.d. = 16%)
- Presentation level of sentences (60 dB SPL)
- Presentation of sentences in sound field from a single loudspeaker at 0 degrees azimuth on the horizontal axis
- Participants seated in a sound-treated booth
- Practice list of 50 sentences before testing
- 15 minute break between blocks of sentence lists
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!