Cephalometric tracing for all patients was performed on tracing paper by one examiner (M.S.). Nineteen landmarks were plotted using Dolphin Imaging by another examiner (S.S.) to measure craniofacial morphology. The validity and reproducibility of the plots were verified by other orthodontic experts who participated in this research as collaborators. All examiners were blinded to the general status of the participants. To examine the intra-examiner reliability of cephalometric measurements, one examiner traced five randomly selected cephalograms before measurement and plotted three arbitrary points (nasion, sella, and pogonion) twice within an interval of one week. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using SPSS 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The ICC was 0.977 (0.957–0.988: 95% confidence interval), confirming the strong reliability of the selected measurements.
Cranio-facial Morphology Analysis using CT
Cephalometric tracing for all patients was performed on tracing paper by one examiner (M.S.). Nineteen landmarks were plotted using Dolphin Imaging by another examiner (S.S.) to measure craniofacial morphology. The validity and reproducibility of the plots were verified by other orthodontic experts who participated in this research as collaborators. All examiners were blinded to the general status of the participants. To examine the intra-examiner reliability of cephalometric measurements, one examiner traced five randomly selected cephalograms before measurement and plotted three arbitrary points (nasion, sella, and pogonion) twice within an interval of one week. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated using SPSS 27.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The ICC was 0.977 (0.957–0.988: 95% confidence interval), confirming the strong reliability of the selected measurements.
Corresponding Organization : Tokushima University
Other organizations : Osaka University of Pharmaceutical Sciences
Variable analysis
- Pre-treatment and post-treatment CT scanning
- Lateral cephalometry before and after treatment
- 3D frontal sinus models
- Volume-rendered images
- Cephalometric measurements of craniofacial morphology
- CT scanning parameters (60-110 kV, 3-15 mA, 0.6 mm collimation, 18 s rotation time, 0.39 mm lamination thickness)
- Lateral cephalometry performed in the standing position with maximum intercuspation
- Cephalometric tracing and landmark plotting by experienced examiners
- Verification of the validity and reproducibility of the plots by other orthodontic experts
- Blinding of the examiners to the general status of the participants
- Intra-examiner reliability assessment of cephalometric measurements with high ICC (0.977)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!