Following each pass, the procured material was placed onto slides for immediate interpretation by an on-site cytopathologist who was blinded to the procedural technique. Three maximum passes were performed with the initial technique until either the procured specimen was deemed to be of satisfactory diagnostic quality or technical failure occurred. Technical failure was defined as malfunction of the needle apparatus prior to establishing a diagnosis with the original sampling technique. If a definitive diagnosis was established within three passes, the procedure was terminated and the number of passes performed was documented. If no diagnosis was established after three passes (defined as diagnostic failure) or if technical failure occurred, the patient was crossed over and up to three further passes were performed using the alternative sampling method. If diagnostic or technical failure occurred again with the alternative technique, the procedure was aborted and a repeat EUS–FNA was arranged for a different day. The occurrence of any immediate complication was noted at the time of the procedure and late complications were documented with follow-up telephone calls 72 hours post-procedure.
EUS-FNA Diagnostic Technique for Solid Masses
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Alabama at Birmingham, AdventHealth Orlando
Protocol cited in 3 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Sampling technique (initial technique vs. alternative technique)
- Diagnostic quality of the procured specimen
- Occurrence of technical failure
- Occurrence of immediate complications
- Occurrence of late complications
- On-site cytopathologist who was blinded to the procedural technique
- Minimal use of the elevator to avoid needle dysfunction
- Positioning of the needle at different areas within the mass using the 'up-down' dial of the echoendoscope
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!