DNA was extracted from head/thorax mosquito samples and feeding substrates following the CTAB-based phenol–chloroform extraction method of Chen et al. [35 (link)] with minor modifications (as described in Schneider et al. [33 ]). Extracted DNA was eluted in 30 µl (mosquitoes, supplemented feeding substrates) or 16 µl (mosquito expectorate substrates) of water and frozen at − 20 °C until use. DNA extracts from mosquitoes, but not from feeding substrates, were diluted fourfold to reduce the effect of inhibitors originating from mosquito material on the performance of the PCR. All PCR reactions were run using 7 µl of (diluted) DNA extracts, and data are presented as genomes/PCR, unless stated otherwise, to account for differences in sample processing.
Quantifying Malaria Parasites from Blood and Mosquitoes
DNA was extracted from head/thorax mosquito samples and feeding substrates following the CTAB-based phenol–chloroform extraction method of Chen et al. [35 (link)] with minor modifications (as described in Schneider et al. [33 ]). Extracted DNA was eluted in 30 µl (mosquitoes, supplemented feeding substrates) or 16 µl (mosquito expectorate substrates) of water and frozen at − 20 °C until use. DNA extracts from mosquitoes, but not from feeding substrates, were diluted fourfold to reduce the effect of inhibitors originating from mosquito material on the performance of the PCR. All PCR reactions were run using 7 µl of (diluted) DNA extracts, and data are presented as genomes/PCR, unless stated otherwise, to account for differences in sample processing.
Corresponding Organization : University of Edinburgh
Variable analysis
- Extraction method for DNA from blood-stage parasites
- Extraction method for DNA from head/thorax mosquito samples and feeding substrates
- QPCR efficiency
- Limit of detection (LOD)
- Blood-stage DNA samples
- Mosquito DNA extracts
- Feeding substrate DNA extracts
- Positive control: Blood-stage DNA samples used to determine qPCR efficiency and limit of detection (LOD)
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!