Measuring SARS-CoV-2 Frameshift Efficiency
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Biophysics, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Henan Normal University, Institute of Zoology
Variable analysis
- Presence or absence of the −1 PRF sequence from SARS-CoV-2 inserted between the coding sequences of renilla luciferase (Rluc) and firefly luciferase (Fluc)
- Frameshifting efficiency, measured by normalizing the WT and Del values to their in-frame controls
- Cell line: 293T cells (ATCC, CRL-3216)
- Transfection method: Lipofectamine 2000
- Plasmids: pDual-SARS-CoV-2 (−1, WT) and pDual-SARS-CoV-2 (0, Ctrl)
- Luciferase assay: Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay Kit (Promega, E1910)
- pDual-SARS-CoV-2 (0, Ctrl) plasmid, where an additional cytosine was inserted immediately after the silent mutated slippery sequence such that Fluc and Rluc were in the same reading frame
- Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!