Food intake measurements on dye-labeled food were performed similarly to the radioactive tracer assay described above. After habituation on the experimental food for four days, flies were transferred at 1 hour past lights-on to identical media containing 1% (w/v) FD&C Blue #1. After 15 min, 1 h, or 4 h of feeding, feeding was interrupted by freezing the vials at −80 °C. Frozen flies were transferred to 1.7 ml Eppendorf tubes and homogenized with a motorized pestle (VWR) in 50 μl of 1× PBS + 1% Triton X-100. The use of detergent (0.01% Triton X-100 is sufficient) is critical for accurate dye measurements from homogenized fly samples. After centrifugation to clear the debris, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 630 nm (A630) on a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Flies fed non-labeled food were used as controls and their A630 values (typically negligible) were subtracted from experimental readings. Serial dilutions of an initial 10 μl aliquot of the non-solidified dye-labeled food added to 0.99 ml of 1× PBS + 1% Triton X-100 were used to generate a standard curve. After determining the equivalent dye concentration of each fly homogenate using the linear fit of the standard curve (R2 was typically >0.99), consumption was calculated by multiplying with the homogenate volume (50 μl) and dividing by the number of flies per sample. Absorbance of the dye with unlabeled fly homogenates did not overlap, demonstrating that eye pigments do not interfere with the assay (
Quantifying Drosophila Food Intake via Radioactive and Dye-based Assays
Food intake measurements on dye-labeled food were performed similarly to the radioactive tracer assay described above. After habituation on the experimental food for four days, flies were transferred at 1 hour past lights-on to identical media containing 1% (w/v) FD&C Blue #1. After 15 min, 1 h, or 4 h of feeding, feeding was interrupted by freezing the vials at −80 °C. Frozen flies were transferred to 1.7 ml Eppendorf tubes and homogenized with a motorized pestle (VWR) in 50 μl of 1× PBS + 1% Triton X-100. The use of detergent (0.01% Triton X-100 is sufficient) is critical for accurate dye measurements from homogenized fly samples. After centrifugation to clear the debris, the absorbance of the supernatant was measured at 630 nm (A630) on a NanoDrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Flies fed non-labeled food were used as controls and their A630 values (typically negligible) were subtracted from experimental readings. Serial dilutions of an initial 10 μl aliquot of the non-solidified dye-labeled food added to 0.99 ml of 1× PBS + 1% Triton X-100 were used to generate a standard curve. After determining the equivalent dye concentration of each fly homogenate using the linear fit of the standard curve (R2 was typically >0.99), consumption was calculated by multiplying with the homogenate volume (50 μl) and dividing by the number of flies per sample. Absorbance of the dye with unlabeled fly homogenates did not overlap, demonstrating that eye pigments do not interfere with the assay (
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Scripps Research Institute, University of Southern California
Protocol cited in 7 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Radioisotope labeling (1-2 μCi/ml [α-32P]-dCTP or 0.5 μCi/ml [14C]-leucine or [1,2-14C]-choline)
- Dye labeling (1% (w/v) FD&C Blue #1)
- Radioisotope incorporation (scintillation counts)
- Dye incorporation (absorbance at 630 nm)
- Flies fed non-labeled food
- Incubation time (24 h for radioisotope, 15 min, 1 h, or 4 h for dye)
- Fly density (10-20 flies per vial)
- Aliquots of the non-solidified food with the radioactive tracer to calculate food volumes
- Serial dilutions of the dye-labeled food to generate a standard curve
- Scintillation counts of flies fed non-labeled food (subtracted from experimental readings)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!