IHC scoring was performed according to the following criteria: percentage of positive cells on the slides was as follows: 0 (negative), 0.1 (1–10% of cells positive), 0.2 (11–20% of cells positive), and 0.3 (20–30% of cells positive), and so forth. Furthermore, the intensity was designated as weak (1 point), moderate (2 points), strong (3 points), or very strong (4). The IHC composite score was calculated by multiplying the extent of positive cells with intensity. Two independent observers examined each slide, and their observations were positively correlated with each other. Average scores were used for analysis, and if the two observers significantly differed in their scoring, a third observer examined the slide.
Immunohistochemistry for Plexin-B3, Ki67, ALDH1-A1, CD31, and CD44
IHC scoring was performed according to the following criteria: percentage of positive cells on the slides was as follows: 0 (negative), 0.1 (1–10% of cells positive), 0.2 (11–20% of cells positive), and 0.3 (20–30% of cells positive), and so forth. Furthermore, the intensity was designated as weak (1 point), moderate (2 points), strong (3 points), or very strong (4). The IHC composite score was calculated by multiplying the extent of positive cells with intensity. Two independent observers examined each slide, and their observations were positively correlated with each other. Average scores were used for analysis, and if the two observers significantly differed in their scoring, a third observer examined the slide.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Nebraska Medical Center, University of Nebraska Medical Center
Variable analysis
- Primary antibodies used for IHC (αPlexin-B3, αKi67, αALDH1-A1, αCD31, αCD44)
- Percentage of positive cells on the slides (0, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, etc.)
- Intensity of staining (weak, moderate, strong, very strong)
- Incubation of slides with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C
- Incubation with biotinylated secondary antibodies for 45 min
- Image capture through Nikon microscope using NIS Element software
- Positive controls: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative controls: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!