Ethical approvals to obtain contemporary clinical isolates of Leptospira spp. are as follows. Isolates from patients in northeast Thailand between October 2000 and December 2006 were obtained during a prospective study of acute febrile illness [20] (link), which was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Public Health, Royal Government of Thailand. Isolates from patients in Laos between August 2006 and October 2009 were obtained during a prospective fever study approved by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OXTREC) and the National Ethics Committee for Health Research (NECHR), Ministry of Health, Government of Lao PDR. Isolates obtained from patients in Sri Lanka between June 2006 and May 2007 were obtained during a prospective fever study approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK and the Ethical Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects except where not required (not required for data analyzed anonymously in Laos PDR at the time of the study). Other clinical isolates were obtained from the China Medical Culture Collection of National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, China, and the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, USA. All data were analyzed anonymously.
Leptospira Isolate Identification and Characterization
Ethical approvals to obtain contemporary clinical isolates of Leptospira spp. are as follows. Isolates from patients in northeast Thailand between October 2000 and December 2006 were obtained during a prospective study of acute febrile illness [20] (link), which was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Ministry of Public Health, Royal Government of Thailand. Isolates from patients in Laos between August 2006 and October 2009 were obtained during a prospective fever study approved by the Oxford Tropical Research Ethics Committee (OXTREC) and the National Ethics Committee for Health Research (NECHR), Ministry of Health, Government of Lao PDR. Isolates obtained from patients in Sri Lanka between June 2006 and May 2007 were obtained during a prospective fever study approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, UK and the Ethical Review Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Kelaniya, Sri Lanka. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects except where not required (not required for data analyzed anonymously in Laos PDR at the time of the study). Other clinical isolates were obtained from the China Medical Culture Collection of National Institutes for Food and Drug Control, China, and the National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, USA. All data were analyzed anonymously.
Corresponding Organization : Mahidol University
Other organizations : Heartlands Hospital, Wellcome Sanger Institute, Genomics (United Kingdom), National Institute for Communicable Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Queensland Health, Royal Tropical Institute, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, University of Bath, Imperial College London, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital
Protocol cited in 11 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Genomic DNA extraction method (with or without the addition of dimethyl sulfoxide)
- Identification of Leptospira spp. through 16S rRNA gene (rrs) amplification and sequencing
- Determination of serovars of Leptospira isolates using the cross-agglutinin absorption test (CAAT)
- Leptospira spp. isolates used in the study (327 isolates listed in Table S1)
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!