Data output of the videos was visually inspected, and upon analysis, data entries reflecting P. aurelia or S. teres particles with a bio-area smaller than 1000 µm2 were removed from the data as these reflected non-living particles that were accidentally tracked. After species identification, videos were again visually inspected to ensure the identification was performed correctly. Trait values of those videos that contained only one of the species were manually assigned to the correct species identity when needed.
Automated Analysis of Microcosm Traits
Data output of the videos was visually inspected, and upon analysis, data entries reflecting P. aurelia or S. teres particles with a bio-area smaller than 1000 µm2 were removed from the data as these reflected non-living particles that were accidentally tracked. After species identification, videos were again visually inspected to ensure the identification was performed correctly. Trait values of those videos that contained only one of the species were manually assigned to the correct species identity when needed.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Zurich, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology
Variable analysis
- Time points of sampling: 4 days after the start of the selection experiment, and on the day of the common garden before inoculation (day 78)
- Population densities (number of cells)
- Traits (bio-area, aspect ratio, and gross speed)
- Sampled volume: 34.4 µl
- Video recording duration: 20 s
- Video frame rate: 25 frames per second
- Microscope magnification: 16x
- Camera: Orca Flash 4 (Hamamatsu)
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned.
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!