All quantitative data are described as the means ± standard deviation (SD), and qualitative data are depicted as numbers (n) and percentages (%). Quantitative data was compared by Student’s t-test and qualitative data was compared by the χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Factors related to study endpoints in univariate analysis and important clinical parameters were put into backward logistic regression analysis or Cox regression analysis to seek the independent predictors. Relation analysis and collinearity diagnosis were also performed, and only one of the variables with a significant correlation was included in the multivariate regression analysis. Similar to our previous studies, the Kaplan–Meier method was utilized to evaluate cumulative survival and the log-rank test was used to evaluate the differences between the two groups in the cumulative survival[15 (link)]. To further evaluate the effect of time to peak TB concentration on predicting patient in-hospital mortality, the area under curve of the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) was computed and the Youden index was employed to assess the optimal cutoff values of time to peak TB concentration. Bilateral P < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant for all analyses. Statistical analysis was performed by using the IBM SPSS version 22.0 software package (SPSS Chicago, IL).
Free full text: Click here