Data on Striga emergence count, ear rot, stalk and root lodging were transformed as [log (counts+1)] to reduce the heterogeneity of variances. The ANOVA for the 150 hybrids generated using the NCD II pooled over sets for each research condition [15 (link)] and across the stress conditions was carried out using the version 9.4 of SAS [33 ]. The genotypic component of the source of variation was partitioned into the variation due to males (sets), females (sets), and female × male (sets) interaction. The F-tests for male (sets), female (sets) and male × female (sets) mean squares were performed using male (sets) × environment, female (sets) × environment and male × female (sets) × environment mean squares, respectively. The mean squares attributable to environment × female × male (sets) were tested using the pooled error mean squares.
The following general linear model was used for the NCD II mating design:
Xijkl=μ+mi+fi+(mf)ij+pijk+Il+εijkl
where Xijkl = the observed value of the progeny of the ith male crossed with jth female in the kth replication; μ = the overall population mean; mi = effect of the ith female; fj = the effect of the jth male mated to the ith female; (mf)ij = the interaction effect between the ithfemale and the jth male; pijk = the effect of the kth progeny from the cross between ith female and jth male; rl = the effect of the lth replication; εijkl = the experimental error. The general combining ability (GCA) effects for male and female within sets (GCAm and GCAf) and specific combining ability (SCA) for each trait were estimated according to Kearsey and Pooni [34 ] as shown below:
GCAm=Xmμ
GCAf=Xfμ
where, GCAm and GCAf = General combining ability effects of male and female parents respectively; Xm and Xf = Average performance of a line when used as a male and female in crosses, respectively and μ = Overall mean of crosses in the set.
Standard errors (SE) for testing significance of GCAm and GCAf estimates, for traits of genotype, were computed from the mean squares of GCAm × environment and GCAf × environment, respectively as follows:
SEforGCAm=MSm×e/(f×e×r)
SEforGCAf=MSf×e/(m×e×r)
where, MSm × e and MSf × e were the mean squares of the interaction between male and environment as well as female × environment, respectively; f, m, r, and e were the number of females, males, replicates, and environments, respectively.
A multiple trait base index (MI) that integrated grain yield with the number of emerged Striga plants, Striga damage rating, plant and ear aspects, delayed leaf senescence, anthesis-silking interval and number of ears per plant was used to select the best performing hybrids across optimal, Striga and low-N conditions [5 (link)]. The means, adjusted for block effects of each genotype for each measured variable was standardized to minimize the effects of the different scales. A positive multiple trait base index value therefore indicated tolerance/resistance of the genotype to both Striga and low-N, while negative values indicated susceptibility to the stresses. The multiple trait base index was computed as follows:
MI = (2 × YLD) + EPP–EASP–PASP—STGR–RAT1 –RAT2 –(0.5 × C01)–(0.5 × C02)
On the other hand, the base indices for Striga and Low-N were computed as STRBI = 2.0 YLD + 1.0 EPP–(RAT1 + RAT2)– 0.5 (C01 + C02) and LNBI = 2.0 YLD + EPP–STGR–ASI—PASP–EASP, respectively to select superior hybrids under the respective stress conditions.
Where: MI = Multiple trait base index
STRBI = Base index for StrigaLNBI = Base index for Low-N
YLD = grain yield across research conditions
EPP = number of ears per plant across research conditions
EASP = Ear aspect across research conditions
PASP = Plant aspect across low-N and optimal conditions
STGR = Stay green characteristic across low-N conditions
RAT1 and RAT2 = Striga damage rating at 8 and 10 WAP across Striga infested conditions
C01 and C02 = Number of emerged Striga plants at 8 and 10 WAP across Striga -infested conditions.
Free full text: Click here