Comprehensive Prevention Services for Subjects
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of California, San Francisco, Institute of Virology of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, EsSALUD, Asociación Civil Impacta Salud y Educación, University of Colorado Denver, San Francisco Department of Public Health, Asociación para la Conservación de la Cuenca Amazónica, Instituto Ecuatoriano de Enfermedades Digestivas, Instituto Evandro Chagas, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Chiang Mai University, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Desmond Tutu HIV Foundation, University of Cape Town, Fenway Health, Brown University, Providence College, Universidade de São Paulo, University of Connecticut, Brighton Hospital, Gilead Sciences (United States), National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
Protocol cited in 23 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Prevention services package (HIV testing, risk-reduction counseling, condoms, diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections)
- Screening for asymptomatic infections (urethritis, syphilis, HSV-2 antibodies, genital warts and ulcers) at 24-week intervals
- Incidence of HIV infection
- Diagnosis and treatment of sexually transmitted infections in subjects and their partners
- All subjects were instructed to protect themselves from HIV with conventional methods, since they were unaware of their study-group assignment
- Subjects who reported a recent unprotected exposure to an HIV-infected partner were referred for postexposure prophylaxis (at sites where such therapy was available), and the administration of a study drug was temporarily suspended
- Vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) was offered to all susceptible subjects
- Negative control: Subjects who were unaware of their study-group assignment and instructed to protect themselves from HIV with conventional methods
- Positive control: Subjects who reported a recent unprotected exposure to an HIV-infected partner and were referred for postexposure prophylaxis
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!