All slides were scanned (3DHISTECH Ltd. Pannoramic slide scanner 250) and evaluated using a virtual microscopy software (3DHISTECH Ltd. Case Viewer Ver.2.2). To quantify lymphocytes, ten high power fields (HPF) were identified independently by two pathologists (A.M. & C.B.). The invasion front and tumor center were identified, and the positive cells were counted. The mean values were calculated. The CD68 reaction was used to visualize all macrophages. To evaluate the quantity of the macrophages, ten HPF of the invasion tumor front and intra-tumoral area were examined and the positive cells were counted. The mean value (confidence interval 95%) of macrophages within the tumor front and the intra-tumoral area was calculated. The macrophages were then characterized concerning their subpopulations. M2-macrophages were detected using CD163-antibody. The M2-macrophages were quantified, utilizing the same previously described procedure for quantifying CD68-positive macrophages. The number of M1-macrophages per HPF was calculated through the difference between CD68-positive-macrophages and CD163-positive-M2-macrophages.
Quantifying Tumor Immune Microenvironment
All slides were scanned (3DHISTECH Ltd. Pannoramic slide scanner 250) and evaluated using a virtual microscopy software (3DHISTECH Ltd. Case Viewer Ver.2.2). To quantify lymphocytes, ten high power fields (HPF) were identified independently by two pathologists (A.M. & C.B.). The invasion front and tumor center were identified, and the positive cells were counted. The mean values were calculated. The CD68 reaction was used to visualize all macrophages. To evaluate the quantity of the macrophages, ten HPF of the invasion tumor front and intra-tumoral area were examined and the positive cells were counted. The mean value (confidence interval 95%) of macrophages within the tumor front and the intra-tumoral area was calculated. The macrophages were then characterized concerning their subpopulations. M2-macrophages were detected using CD163-antibody. The M2-macrophages were quantified, utilizing the same previously described procedure for quantifying CD68-positive macrophages. The number of M1-macrophages per HPF was calculated through the difference between CD68-positive-macrophages and CD163-positive-M2-macrophages.
Corresponding Organization : Heidelberg University
Other organizations : Medical University of Vienna
Protocol cited in 1 other protocol
Variable analysis
- CD4 (Ventana, anti-CD4 Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody, Clone SP35, dilution: 1:200)
- CD8 (Ventana, anti-CD8 Rabbit Monoclonal Primary Antibody, Clone SP57, dilution: 1:200)
- CD68 (Dako Anti-Human CD68, Clone KP1, dilution: 1:200)
- CD163 (Novocastra, Lyophilized Mouse Monoclonal Antibody CD163, Clone 10D6, dilution: 1:100)
- Number of lymphocytes (CD4+ and CD8+) in the tumor invasion front and tumor center
- Number of macrophages (CD68+) in the tumor invasion front and intra-tumoral area
- Number of M2-macrophages (CD163+) in the tumor invasion front and intra-tumoral area
- Number of M1-macrophages (CD68+ and CD163-) in the tumor invasion front and intra-tumoral area
- Tissue from the pathological routine diagnostics
- Formalin-fixed (4% neutral buffered formalin) paraffin-embedded tissue blocks
- Tissue sections (4 µm thickness)
- Antigen retrieval by heat treatment lasting for 32 min with Tris-EDTA Borat Puffer (pH 8–8.5)
- Hematoxylin counterstaining of nuclei
- Positive control: Hematoxylin-eosin slide to identify the tumor (Figure 1A,B)
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!