The ability to identify proteins post-translationally modified by phosphorylation is the goal of many proteomic studies. Immobilized metalion affinity chromatography (IMAC; UNIT 10.11B) has been shown to have a strong binding affinity for phosphorylated amino acid residues (see reviews by Porath, 1992 (link); Smith and Figeys, 2008 (link); Macek et al., 2009 (link)). However, it has been shown that IMAC has an equally strong affinity for peptides with low overall pI (peptides with a high content of Asp and Glu), and its relatively low binding capacity can be a limitation for complex samples (Arrell et al., 2006 (link)). An alternative to the usual metals used in IMAC (e.g., Fe3+, Ga3+, and Al3+) is the use of titanium dioxide (TiO2) beads, which have a very high affinity for phosphopeptides and are particularly efficient at enriching phosphopeptides from complex samples. By binding samples to the TiO2 beads in highly acidic buffers, the selectivity of TiO2 beads for negatively charged phosphopeptides is further improved (Larsen et al., 2005 (link); Thingholm et al., 2006 (link); Thingholm and Larsen, 2009 (link)). Complementarity between IMAC and TiO2 stems from the fact that, while both will bind both mono- and multiply phosphorylated peptides, TiO2 binds multiply phosphorylated peptides so tightly that their elution from TiO2 is nearly impossible. Therefore, the phosphoproteome sequence coverage can be increased when the two methods are combined, in an approach termed SIMAC (Sequential elution from IMAC; Thingholm et al., 2008 (link), 2009 (link); see Fig. 10.25.2). This protocol outlines the steps involved in performing SIMAC for the enrichment of mono- and multiply phosphorylated peptides, although either IMAC or TiO2 can be used independently following the same protocol.
NOTE: Use only HPLC- and/or mass spectrometry–grade reagents throughout the protocol.