At the baseline visit of both the PLACE and SPECTRA trial, demographics and medical history were taken, and an ophthalmologic examination and imaging were performed. This extensive ophthalmologic examination included best-corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters, and retinal and foveal sensitivity on microperimetry (Macular Integrity Assessment microperimetry, Centervue, Padova, Italy). Imaging included OCT scans, fundus autofluorescence, fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography, ICGA, and were made by certified medical photographers. Patients were randomized to treatment with half-dose PDT or either eplerenone (SPECTRA trial) or high-density subthreshold micropulse laser (PLACE trial). For half-dose PDT, the area to be treated was determined by the central reading center based on hyperfluorescent areas on ICGA compatible with SRF on OCT and leakage on fluorescein angiography. Before the start of the half-dose PDT, the pupil of the eye to be treated was dilated with topical 1.0% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine. Afterward, 3 mg/m2 body surface verteporfin (Visudyne; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) was administered over 10 minutes through an intravenous drip. Fifteen minutes after the starting the verteporfin infusion, an anesthetic drop containing oxybuprocaine 0.4% was administered before placing a PDT contact lens (×1.5; Volk Optical, Mentor, OH) on the eye. Finally, half-dose PDT was performed in the target treatment area with a standard fluency of 50 J/cm2, wavelength of 689 nm, and duration of 83 seconds. At the first visit (6 weeks to 3 months after baseline and treatment) and at the 1-year visit (at 8–12 months after treatment), patients underwent ophthalmologic examination and imaging again. Data of the follow-up at 2 years after the baseline were also collected if present, in most cases, as a final follow-up in the trial setting, but also as a routine follow-up in the clinic.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Radboud University Medical Center
Other organizations :
University Hospital Cologne, Roche (Switzerland), John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Fondation Asile des Aveugles, University of Lausanne
Treatment with high-density subthreshold micropulse laser (PLACE trial)
dependent variables
Best-corrected visual acuity in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters
Retinal and foveal sensitivity on microperimetry (Macular Integrity Assessment microperimetry)
Findings on OCT scans, fundus autofluorescence, fundus photographs, fluorescein angiography, ICGA
control variables
Baseline demographics and medical history
Ophthalmologic examination and imaging procedures
Pupil dilation with topical 1.0% tropicamide and 2.5% phenylephrine before half-dose PDT
Administration of 3 mg/m^2 body surface verteporfin over 10 minutes through an intravenous drip
Application of anesthetic drop containing oxybuprocaine 0.4% before placing a PDT contact lens (×1.5) on the eye
Half-dose PDT with a standard fluency of 50 J/cm^2, wavelength of 689 nm, and duration of 83 seconds
controls
Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required