We used Web of Science (http://apps.webofknowledge.com/), Google Scholar (http://scholar.google.com/), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (www.cnki.net/) for an exhaustive search of articles published before March 2018. The keywords and phrases used for literature research were as follows: (i) “nitrogen addition,” “nitrogen amendment,” “nitrogen enrichment,” “nitrogen fertilizer,” “nitrogen elevated,” or “nitrogen deposition”; (ii) “glucosidase,” “cellobiosidase,” “xylosidase,” “peroxidase,” “phenol oxidase,” “polyphenol oxidase,” “lignin modifying enzymes,” or “cellulase”; (iii) “soil carbon”; and (iv) “terrestrial,” “soil,” or “land”. To be included in our data set, articles had to meet several requirements. First, we only considered experiments that lasted at least 1 year. Second, control and N addition treatments had to be applied at the same experimental site; that is, the microclimate, vegetation, and soil types were similar between treatments. Third, SDs and replicates had to be reported or could be derived from the results. Fourth, details on N addition methods (rate, frequency, form, and duration) had to be provided. We identified 40 studies that met these criteria, and 9 of these studies reported soil C data from the matching studies (see Supplementary Materials and Methods and data S1). For each study, we recorded LME activity and cellulase activity (see Supplementary Materials and Methods and table S1), site location (longitude and latitude) and climatic variables (MAP and MAT), elevation, BND, vegetation and soil types, and N addition methods (rate, duration, frequency, and form of N addition). If these data were not reported, we contacted the corresponding author for more information. Otherwise, we obtained MAT and MAP from the WorldClim database (www.worldclim.org/), BND from the Global N deposition database (http://webmap.ornl.gov/). We classified vegetation types according to the Whittaker Biome Diagram (38 ), and soil types according to the Food and Agriculture Organization taxonomy (www.fao.org/soils-portal/soil-survey/soil-classification/usda-soil-taxonomy/en). Where available, we also tabulated plant productivity, soil pH, soil C/N, microbial abundance, soil texture, and the size of the recalcitrant C pool (see Supplementary Materials and Methods and data S2 and S3). When results were presented graphically, we used Engauge Digitizer 4.1 (http://digitizer.sourceforge.net) to digitize the data.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Chen J., Luo Y., van Groenigen K.J., Hungate B.A., Cao J., Zhou X, & Wang R.W. (2018). A keystone microbial enzyme for nitrogen control of soil carbon storage. Science Advances, 4(8), eaaq1689.
Corresponding Organization : Northern Arizona University
Other organizations :
Northwestern Polytechnical University, Aarhus University, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, University of Exeter, Xi'an Jiaotong University, East China Normal University
Experimental site (microclimate, vegetation, and soil types) between control and N addition treatments
Standard deviations and replicates reported or derivable from results
Details on N addition methods (rate, frequency, form, and duration)
positive controls
None specified
negative controls
Control treatment without nitrogen addition at the same experimental site
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required