Standardized Ultrasound Evaluation of Rheumatoid Arthritis
A set of high-quality US images of synovitis of wrist, PIP, knees and MTP joints from patients with RA was evaluated using images from the same register and applying the same approach as described in step 1. After the exercise on static images, the experts performed bilateral US scanning of the wrist, PIP,2–5 (link) knee and MTP1–5 (link) joints in six different patients twice in two rounds over 2 days (first day wrist and PIP joints, second day knee and MTP joints), using predefined joint positions as follows:
Wrist joints (ie, radiocarpal and midcarpal joints were evaluated as a single site): palms facing down and wrist positioned flat on the examining table, as neutral as possible but relaxed; shoulder and elbow relaxed; elbow rested on the table. Scanning at the level of the radio-lunate joint.
PIP joints: palms facing down and wrist positioned flat on the examining table, as neutral as possible but relaxed, scanning on the dorsal midline aspect.
Knee joints (ie, suprapatellar and parapatellar recesses were scored as a single site): knee 30° flexed and scanning on suprapatellar midline for the suprapatellar recess; knee extended and scanning the parapatellar areas using the retinacula as a landmark for the parapatellar medial and lateral recesses. Doppler signal was recorded only in the medial and lateral parapatellar recesses.
MTP joints: foot placed resting (with knee 30° flexed) over its plantar aspect. Scanning recorded on the dorsal midline aspect.
For all examinations, identical ESAOTE Technos MPX (Genoa, Italy) US machines with an 8–14 MHz linear array transducer were used with identical PD settings (frequency of 10.1 MHz, pulse repetition frequency of 750 Hz and Doppler gain of 50–53 dB). Each patient was assigned to one machine and the sonographers then rotated from one machine to the next in a predefined sequence with 10 min allocated for scanning and recording the findings on a standard score sheet. Participants were blinded to the patients’ clinical details (ie, presence or not of active disease).17
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Terslev L., Naredo E., Aegerter P., Wakefield R.J., Backhaus M., Balint P., Bruyn G.A., Iagnocco A., Jousse-Joulin S., Schmidt W.A., Szkudlarek M., Conaghan P.G., Filippucci E, & D'Agostino M.A. (2017). Scoring ultrasound synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR-OMERACT ultrasound taskforce-Part 2: reliability and application to multiple joints of a standardised consensus-based scoring system. RMD Open, 3(1), e000427.
Other organizations :
Glostrup Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Center for Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Hôpital Ambroise-Paré, Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Inserm, NIHR Leeds Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Unit, University of Leeds, Park-Klinik Weißensee, Institute of Rheumatology, University of Turin, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Brest, Immanuel Krankenhaus, Marche Polytechnic University, Clínica Santa María, CHU Ambroise Paré
Presence and degree of synovitis in the wrist, PIP, knee, and MTP joints
Doppler signal in the medial and lateral parapatellar recesses
control variables
Identical ESAOTE Technos MPX (Genoa, Italy) US machines used for all examinations
Identical PD settings (frequency of 10.1 MHz, pulse repetition frequency of 750 Hz and Doppler gain of 50–53 dB) used for all examinations
Participants were blinded to the patients' clinical details (ie, presence or not of active disease)
controls
No positive or negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the provided information.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required