Normality Test and Correlation Analysis of Blanket Bogs and Wind Farms

Shapiro normality test was completed in RStudio 1.4 for all variables with recognised blanket bogs studied at the European regional level (Table 5) before undertaking further statistical tests. Since all data was normally distributed, relationships between the recognised area of blanket bogs and the windfarm developments were tested using Pearson correlation test.Table 5

Normality test results of all variables studied at European regions NUTS level 2.

Variable	Test value	p value
Recognised blanket bog area	0.44	< 0.001
Total number turbines	0.42	< 0.001
Total length of tracks	0.48	< 0.001
Total affected area	0.50	< 0.001

Free full text: Click here

Chico G., Clewer T., Midgley N.G., Gallego-Anex P., Ramil-Rego P., Ferreiro J., Whayman E., Goeckeritz S, & Stanton T. (2023). The extent of windfarm infrastructures on recognised European blanket bogs. Scientific Reports, 13, 3919.

Publication 2023

European Nuts

Corresponding Organization : Nottingham Trent University

Other organizations : Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Loughborough University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Total number turbines
Total length of tracks
Total affected area

dependent variables

Recognised blanket bog area

control variables

None explicitly mentioned

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!