Of 296 volunteers at the San Diego HIV Neurobehavioral Research Center (HNRC) who completed the same test battery over two to six visits, 172 were HIV− controls recruited between 1999 and 2006 and 124 were clinically stable HIV+ individuals recruited through the multi-site CNS HIV Antiretroviral Therapy Effects Research (CHARTER) study between 2001 and 2007. An additional, “validation group” was 111 HIV− volunteers who completed a subset of the same test battery at two time points and 67 who completed the abbreviated battery at three time points at the HNRC between 1987 and 1999. Table 1 compares the demographic characteristics and provide summary results on the NP test battery for the normative HIV− and HIV+ groups and the validation sample. Neuromedical stability was defined for the HIV+ group as having: ( a) stable HIV disease indicators between visits (i.e., CD4 counts not changing among following categories >500, 500–200, <200; < 1 log10 change in their plasma HIV RNA levels (viral load); and no new AIDS defining illnesses), (b) no change in their antiretroviral regimen, and (c) no incident psychiatric illness (i.e., major depressive episode or substance use disorder) or neurological events (i.e., head injury or meningitis) between visits. Participants with a history of non-HIV related neuromedical factors that might potentially cause neurocognitive impairment were excluded. These exclusion criteria were (a) head injury with unconsciousness greater than 30 minutes, (b) any known, non HIV related neurological disorders (e.g., epilepsy, stroke), psychotic disorders (schizophrenia) and (c) significant levels of current self-reported substance use, defined as more than three alcoholic drinks per day over the past 30 days, or use of any illegal drugs in the past 30 days. Diagnosis of bipolar disorder was not disqualifying so long as patients were stable on their medications.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Cysique L.A., Franklin D J.r., Abramson I., Ellis R.J., Letendre S., Collier A., Marra C., Clifford D., Gelman B., McArthur J., Morgello S., Simpson D., McCutchan J.A., Grant I, & Heaton R.K. (2011). Normative data and validation of a regression based summary score for assessing meaningful neuropsychological change. Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology, 33(5), 505-522.
Other organizations :
University of Washington, Washington University in St. Louis, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Johns Hopkins University, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
HIV status (HIV-negative controls vs. clinically stable HIV-positive individuals)
dependent variables
Neurocognitive test battery performance
control variables
Participants with a history of non-HIV related neuromedical factors that might potentially cause neurocognitive impairment were excluded (head injury with unconsciousness greater than 30 minutes, any known non-HIV related neurological disorders, psychotic disorders, and significant levels of current self-reported substance use)
Participants with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder were included as long as they were stable on their medications
positive controls
172 HIV-negative controls recruited between 1999 and 2006
negative controls
111 HIV-negative volunteers who completed a subset of the same test battery at two time points
67 HIV-negative volunteers who completed the abbreviated battery at three time points
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required