Retrospective Study: Ethical Approval

This study adhered to the standards of the Declaration of Helsinki and current ethical guidelines. Ethical approval was obtained by the institutional review board of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University and Songklanagarind Hospital (REC.65-317-7-1). The requirement for informed consent for this study was waived by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University and Songklanagarind Hospital as the study was a retrospective study.

Free full text: Click here

Bannangkoon K., Hongsakul K., Tubtawee T., Ina N, & Chichareon P. (2023). Association of myosteatosis with treatment response and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing chemoembolization: a retrospective cohort study. Scientific Reports, 13, 3978.

Publication 2023

Faculty Institutional review board Medicine

Corresponding Organization : Prince of Songkla University

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Independent variables not explicitly mentioned.

dependent variables

Dependent variables not explicitly mentioned.

control variables

Control variables not explicitly mentioned.

controls

The study was a retrospective study, and the requirement for informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University and Songklanagarind Hospital.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!