The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies with no major outcome indicators in the literature; (2) case reports, abstracts, conference reports or experiments; and (3) studies whose samples had undergone surgery of other organs.
Robotic-assisted Hysterectomy vs. Open Hysterectomy
The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) studies with no major outcome indicators in the literature; (2) case reports, abstracts, conference reports or experiments; and (3) studies whose samples had undergone surgery of other organs.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Variable analysis
- Type of surgical procedure (robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy vs. open hysterectomy)
- Operative time
- Blood loss
- Blood transfusion
- Resection margins
- Hospital stay
- Postoperative complications
- Recurrence rate
- Patient sex
- Patient age
- Patient race
- Patient nationality
- The control group received open hysterectomy (OH)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!