Eligible patients consulted one of the three participating primary care clinics during the recruitment period with a clinical suspicion of COVID-19 based on the Federal Office of Public Health case definition of a clinical suspicion [19 ].
The case definition evolved over the study period, corresponding initially to symptoms of an acute respiratory infection (e.g., cough, sore throat, dyspnea) and fever ≥ 38 °C, later modified to “or” fever and with the addition of the sudden onset of loss of smell or taste. Asymptomatic patients were excluded. Children and adolescents could be included, but were not usually seen in the participating study centers.
In the walk-in clinics, a first triage system was established whereby patients who arrived onsite self-assessed if they were COVID-19 suspects with the official criteria of the time of having fever, cough, or respiratory distress. COVID-19-suspected cases entered the specific COVID-19 flow where a nurse conducted a second triage, collecting patients’ vital signs, symptoms, risk factors and professional exposure, and past contact with confirmed or suspected cases (see Supplementary material). Patients with clinical danger signs were referred to the hospital. Patients with signs of clinical pneumonia, symptomatic patients with risk factors, or health professionals were referred for a medical consultation and a nasopharyngeal swab for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing on-site. All other patients were not tested and sent home with self-isolation instructions, as per national recommendations. From April 26th onwards, all patients were tested by triage nurses in walk-in clinic A, without a medical consultation (unless considered necessary). In the private practice and walk-in clinic B, all patients benefited from a medical consultation until the end of the study.
Because of the many uncertainties around the clinical course of COVID in this initial phase of the pandemic, telephone follow-ups were organized two, four, and eight days after the initial consultations of all patients (corresponding time windows: 1–3 days; 4–6 days; and 7–12 days). Phone calls were conducted by supervised medical students or nurses at the walk-in clinics and by the general practitioner in the private practice. Follow-up was systematic for all patients at walk-in clinic A, and only for RT-PCR-positive patients at the other two sites.
An additional telephone follow up was conducted for research purpose to assess clinical outcomes at least 28 days after the initial consultation. The study was approved on 27 April 2020, by the Cantonal Research Ethics Committee of the canton of Vaud, Switzerland (CER-VD 2020-00901). Patients’ consent was sought retrospectively for patients consulting before April 27th, and prospectively thereafter.
Free full text: Click here