Wound eversion was objectively assessed with a ruler on the adjacent flat skin surface parallelly aside from the midpoint. Data were collected immediately after surgery and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Complications such as wound dehiscence, seroma or hematoma, infection and spitting sutures were observed and recorded for at least 12 months after surgery.
Scarring Assessment and Wound Healing Evaluation
Wound eversion was objectively assessed with a ruler on the adjacent flat skin surface parallelly aside from the midpoint. Data were collected immediately after surgery and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Complications such as wound dehiscence, seroma or hematoma, infection and spitting sutures were observed and recorded for at least 12 months after surgery.
Corresponding Organization : Ruijin Hospital
Other organizations : Plastic Surgery Hospital
Variable analysis
- Topical perfusion measured with the PeriCam PSI System using the Region of Interests (ROIs) method
- Wound eversion objectively assessed with a ruler on the adjacent flat skin surface parallelly aside from the midpoint
- Patient Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS) scores (pain, pruritus, color, stiffness, thickness and irregularity)
- Observer Scar Assessment Scale (OSAS) scores (vascularity, pigmentation, thickness, relief, pliability, and surface)
- Recurrence of Keloid or Hypertrophic Scar (PS) defined as a POSAS thickness score >= 5
- Scar width monitored for 18 months
- Complications (wound dehiscence, seroma or hematoma, infection and spitting sutures) observed and recorded for at least 12 months after surgery
- Measurements taken immediately after surgery and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!