Protocol detail

Comprehensive Cerebral Palsy Assessment

Find Similar Protocols

We will collect relevant variables from the NINDS Common Data Elements (43 ) (CDEs) for Cerebral Palsy, including: General Demographics, Social Status, Pregnancy & Perinatal History, Medical History, Motor Development History, Neurological Exam, Rehabilitation Therapies, Gross Motor Function Classification System at 18 months of age (3 (link)), and the Manual Ability Classification System at 18 months of age (44 (link)).

Free full text: Click here

Prosser L.A., Skorup J., Pierce S.R., Jawad A.F., Fagg A.H., Kolobe T.H, & Smith B.A. (2023). Locomotor learning in infants at high risk for cerebral palsy: A study protocol. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 11, 891633.

Publication 2023

Cerebral palsy Rehabilitation therapies

Top 5 similar protocols

Variable analysis

independent variables

Pregnancy & Perinatal History
Medical History

dependent variables

Motor Development History
Neurological Exam
Rehabilitation Therapies
Gross Motor Function Classification System at 18 months of age
Manual Ability Classification System at 18 months of age

control variables

General Demographics
Social Status

controls

Positive controls not explicitly mentioned.
Negative controls not explicitly mentioned.

Annotations

Based on most similar protocols

Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.

As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!