The same method was used to test databases against 3412 genome sequences available in the NCBI non-redundant and WGS databases as of February 2019. These genome assemblies were bulk downloaded from NCBI as a compressed .tar file for local analysis. Genomes lacking oxaAb were removed prior to typing but quality control (QC) analysis as described above was applied to this data set only after typing was complete.
Automated Kaptive Typing of Acinetobacter Genomes
The same method was used to test databases against 3412 genome sequences available in the NCBI non-redundant and WGS databases as of February 2019. These genome assemblies were bulk downloaded from NCBI as a compressed .tar file for local analysis. Genomes lacking oxaAb were removed prior to typing but quality control (QC) analysis as described above was applied to this data set only after typing was complete.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Monash University, Queensland University of Technology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney
Protocol cited in 21 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Use of Kaptive with novel KL and OCL reference databases to type Acinetobacter genome assemblies
- Accuracy of typing results compared to manually or automatically determined KL and OCL types
- High-quality Acinetobacter genome assemblies (n=719) with a maximum contig number of 300 and minimum assembly length of 3.6 Mbp
- Confirmation of Acinetobacter baumannii species assignment based on presence of oxaAb gene
- Manual or automated sequence inspection of KL and OCL types in the genome assemblies used for assessment [2, 41]
- None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!