Reprogramming Mouse and Human Fibroblasts to iPSCs
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Wellcome Sanger Institute, University of Edinburgh, MRC Centre for Regenerative Medicine, University of Toronto
Protocol cited in 31 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Amount of mFx transposon (10ng, 100ng, or 400ng)
- Amount of PB-TET-MKOS transposon (25ng, 50ng, or 100ng)
- Amount of pCyL43 PB transposase plasmid (100ng)
- Efficiency of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cell colony formation
- Characterization of established iPS cells (e.g., gene expression, DNA preparation)
- Cell seeding density (1.25x10^5 cells/10cm^2 for MEFs, 6.25x10^4 cells/10cm^2 for HEFs)
- Cell culture media (DMEM, 15% FBS, penicillin-streptomycin, glutamax, β-mercaptoethanol, sodium-pyruvate, non-essential amino acids, LIF for MEFs; DMEM, 15% human serum, 10ng/mL bFGF, penicillin-streptomycin, glutamax, non-essential amino acids for HEFs; KO-DMEM, 20% serum replacement, 10ng/mL bFGF, penicillin-streptomycin, glutamax, non-essential amino acids for human iPS cells)
- Transfection reagent (FugeneHD) and DNA:Fugene ratio (2μg:8μL)
- Doxycycline concentration (1.5μg/mL, unless otherwise indicated)
- Cell maintenance and passaging conditions (MEFs on gelatin, HEFs on mitomycin-c arrested MEFs, human iPS cells on inactivated MEFs)
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!