Participants reported their choice on each trial after the stimulus had ended by pressing one of two keyboard buttons. The button-choice contingency was counterbalanced across participants: half the participants pressed the āFā button with their left index finger and the āJā button with their right index finger to indicate longer and shorter test durations, respectively, while the other half responded with the reverse mapping. Participants were instructed to make each response as quickly and accurately as possible. To ensure an equal number of consecutive stimulus pairs, while retaining a long-term pseudorandom structure, the order of stimulus presentation was determined by a pseudorandom 54 de Bruijn sequence. This creates an optimally short (pseudorandom) sequence of stimuli (625 trials total) in which each contiguous subsequence of 4 stimuli (from the 5 possible stimulus intervals) occurs exactly once [68 (link)]. Accordingly, each individual stimulus occurred 125 times, each possible pair occurred 25 times, each possible triplet occurred 5 times, and each quadruplet occurred once (per block).
Perceptual Timing Judgment Tasks
Participants reported their choice on each trial after the stimulus had ended by pressing one of two keyboard buttons. The button-choice contingency was counterbalanced across participants: half the participants pressed the āFā button with their left index finger and the āJā button with their right index finger to indicate longer and shorter test durations, respectively, while the other half responded with the reverse mapping. Participants were instructed to make each response as quickly and accurately as possible. To ensure an equal number of consecutive stimulus pairs, while retaining a long-term pseudorandom structure, the order of stimulus presentation was determined by a pseudorandom 54 de Bruijn sequence. This creates an optimally short (pseudorandom) sequence of stimuli (625 trials total) in which each contiguous subsequence of 4 stimuli (from the 5 possible stimulus intervals) occurs exactly once [68 (link)]. Accordingly, each individual stimulus occurred 125 times, each possible pair occurred 25 times, each possible triplet occurred 5 times, and each quadruplet occurred once (per block).
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Shaanxi Normal University, Bar-Ilan University
Variable analysis
- Duration of the test stimulus (300 ms, 395 ms, 520 ms, 684 ms, 900 ms)
- Participants' responses indicating whether the test stimulus duration was longer or shorter than the reference duration
- Presentation of 5 or more visual (or auditory) reference stimuli with a duration of 520 ms before each block
- Counterbalancing of the button-choice contingency across participants
- Pseudorandom order of stimulus presentation using a de Bruijn sequence to ensure an equal number of consecutive stimulus pairs
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!