The total FasL immunostaining score was computed according to Wang et al. (39 (link)). Briefly, the percentage of positive was defined as 0 (<5%, negative), 1 (5–25%, sporadic), 2 (25–50%, focal), or 3 (>50%, diffuse). Staining intensity was defined as 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining), or 3 (strong staining). The total score of immunostaining was computed as the percentage positive score × staining intensity score, and ranged from 0 to 9. We examined five successive fields as a section and summed the scores.
Rat Brain Fas Ligand Immunostaining
The total FasL immunostaining score was computed according to Wang et al. (39 (link)). Briefly, the percentage of positive was defined as 0 (<5%, negative), 1 (5–25%, sporadic), 2 (25–50%, focal), or 3 (>50%, diffuse). Staining intensity was defined as 0 (no staining), 1 (weak staining), 2 (moderate staining), or 3 (strong staining). The total score of immunostaining was computed as the percentage positive score × staining intensity score, and ranged from 0 to 9. We examined five successive fields as a section and summed the scores.
Corresponding Organization : Tianjin Medical University
Variable analysis
- Perfusion with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (pH 7.4)
- FasL immunostaining score
- Percentage of positive staining
- Staining intensity
- Rat brain tissue samples
- Primary antibody against rat Fas ligand (Abcam Anti-Fas Ligand antibody)
- Incubation conditions (4°C overnight)
- Use of complement, HRP conjugate, and DAB
- Counterstaining with hematoxylin
- Imaging with Olympus microscopy
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!