Inclusion criteria for selected studies were: (1) Studies written in English language; and (2) Studies analyzing postoperative hypophosphatemia as a prognostic factor for PHLF, overall postoperative morbidity and liver regeneration (patients after different types of liver resections, including living-donor liver donation). Exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Abstracts, case reports, editorials, letters, systematic reviews and meta-analyses; (2) Studies with incomplete data for further analysis (studies with no reported postoperative complications or phosphorus, studies analyzing postoperative hypophosphatemia in liver transplant recipients); (3) Duplicate studies; and (4) Studies in languages other than English.
Protocol detail
Postoperative Hypophosphatemia as Prognostic Factor
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Hypophosphatemia
Liver
Liver regeneration
Living donor
Patients
Phosphorus
Postoperative complications
Prognostic factor
Resections of liver
Transplant recipients
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
Top 5 similar protocols
Variable analysis
independent variables
- Not explicitly mentioned
- Postoperative hypophosphatemia
- PHLF (Posthepatectomy liver failure)
- Overall postoperative morbidity
- Liver regeneration
- Studies written in English language
- Studies analyzing postoperative hypophosphatemia as a prognostic factor for PHLF, overall postoperative morbidity and liver regeneration (patients after different types of liver resections, including living-donor liver donation)
- Exclusion of abstracts, case reports, editorials, letters, systematic reviews and meta-analyses
- Exclusion of studies with incomplete data for further analysis (studies with no reported postoperative complications or phosphorus, studies analyzing postoperative hypophosphatemia in liver transplant recipients)
- Exclusion of duplicate studies
- Exclusion of studies in languages other than English
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
Sign up for free or login to display all annotations
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!