Women with HR results received genetic counseling. Most of them underwent prenatal diagnosis. The pregnant women voluntarily chose traditional karyotype analysis and/or CMA after receiving genetic counselling from the clinicians. Both centers used the same detection platform, experimental scheme, and quality control standards, and participated in the laboratory quality control evaluation plan.
Prenatal Screening for Chromosomal Abnormalities
Women with HR results received genetic counseling. Most of them underwent prenatal diagnosis. The pregnant women voluntarily chose traditional karyotype analysis and/or CMA after receiving genetic counselling from the clinicians. Both centers used the same detection platform, experimental scheme, and quality control standards, and participated in the laboratory quality control evaluation plan.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : Nanjing Medical University
Other organizations : Lianyungang Maternal and Children’s Hospital, Yangzhou University
Variable analysis
- Maternal age
- Gestational age
- Maternal weight
- Insulin-dependent diabetes
- Levels of α-fetoprotein (AFP)
- Levels of free β subunit human chorionic gonadotropin (fβhCG)
- Risk values of neural tube defects (NTD)
- Risk values of T21
- Risk values of T18
- Blood samples collected between 15 weeks 0 days and 22 weeks 6 days
- Quantification of AFP and fβhCG levels by time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TRFIA) using Wallac 1235 AutoDELFIA
- Risk values calculated using the Lifecycle software (4.0)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!