The first muscle stiffness sample was collected on the day before the marathon. The quadriceps muscle of the thigh and the triceps muscle of the calf were measured. All measurements were performed in a designated room. Rigidity measurements were taken at rest the day before the marathon. Subsequent measurements were made 1–2 h before the start and just after the end of the marathon run. All tests were performed by the same trained person to operate the MYOTON device. The participants were prone on their backs or their stomachs on a unique bed, and they rested for 10 min before muscle stiffness measurements were taken. Testing sites on each muscle were located using a tape measure and marked using a skin-safe pen (Figure 1). A pillow was placed under the head, and a unique roller pillow was placed under the lower leg to aid relaxation. One series of three single Myoton measurements of each muscle group (12 points) were measured separately for the left and right legs. In addition, for a better understanding of the problem, the functionality of the lower limb was also determined - the dominant and non-dominant leg. The dominant leg for a particular runner was determined based on the information provided by the marathoner in the questionnaire. The reliability between trials (within session) of the one selected muscles (two series of 10 single measurements) of each group was tested using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model. Domholdt (1993) classification scales for interpreting ICCs was used: very high =1.00–0.90; high = 0.89–0.70; moderate = 0.69–0.50; low = 0.49–0.26. This indicated that Rectus femoris reach (ICC = 0.82) and Gastrocnemius (ICC = 0.85). The high reliability coefficient indicated that applied tests represent consistent measurement of muscle stiffness data among the runners.
Mackala K., Mroczek D., Chmura P., Konefał M., Pawlik D., Ochman B., Chmura J., Paleczny B., Seredyński R., Wyciszkiewicz M., Nowicka-Czudak A., Łopusiewicz W., Adamiec D., Wiecha S., Ponikowski P, & Ponikowska B. (2023). Impact of marathon performance on muscles stiffness in runners over 50 years old. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1069774.
Publication 2023
Device GastrocnemiusHead Iccs Lower limb Marathon Muscle Quadriceps muscle of the thighRectus femoris RigiditySkin Stomachs
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations :
University School of Physical Education in Wroclaw, Wroclaw Medical University, Józef Piłsudski University of Physical Education in Warsaw, Silesian Center for Heart Disease
Time of muscle stiffness measurement (day before marathon, 1-2 h before start, just after end of marathon)
dependent variables
Muscle stiffness of the quadriceps muscle of the thigh
Muscle stiffness of the triceps muscle of the calf
control variables
Measurement location (designated room)
Measurement position (prone on back or stomach with 10 min rest period)
Measurement device (MYOTON device)
Measurement operator (same trained person)
Dominant and non-dominant leg functionality
positive controls
Reliability between trials (within session) of the selected muscles was tested using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) model, showing high reliability for Rectus femoris (ICC = 0.82) and Gastrocnemius (ICC = 0.85)
negative controls
No negative controls were explicitly mentioned in the information provided
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required