Movie frames were aligned with MotionCorr2 (Zheng et al., 2017 (link)) and the defocus parameters were estimated with CTFFIND4 (49). 333 high-quality micrographs were selected by manual inspection, from which ~ 55,000 particles were picked with DOG in Appion (Lander et al., 2009 (link)). Particle stacks were generated in Appion using a box size of 200 pixels. Several successive rounds of 2D and 3D classification were performed in Relion 2 (Scheres, 2012 (link); Kimanius et al., 2016 (link)) using an initial model generated by Common Lines in EMAN2 (53) leading to a final stack of ~14,000 particles for 3D structure refinement in Relion.
Cryo-TEM Structural Analysis of Mla Complex
Movie frames were aligned with MotionCorr2 (Zheng et al., 2017 (link)) and the defocus parameters were estimated with CTFFIND4 (49). 333 high-quality micrographs were selected by manual inspection, from which ~ 55,000 particles were picked with DOG in Appion (Lander et al., 2009 (link)). Particle stacks were generated in Appion using a box size of 200 pixels. Several successive rounds of 2D and 3D classification were performed in Relion 2 (Scheres, 2012 (link); Kimanius et al., 2016 (link)) using an initial model generated by Common Lines in EMAN2 (53) leading to a final stack of ~14,000 particles for 3D structure refinement in Relion.
Variable analysis
- Purified Mla complex concentration (~1 mg/ml)
- Blotting time (6 s)
- Plunging method (liquid ethane using a Vitrobot)
- Microscope parameters (FEI Tecnai G2 F20 200 kV Cryo-TEM, Gatan K-2 Summit Direct Electron Detector camera, pixel size of 1.26 Å/pixel)
- Defocus range (-1 to -2 µm)
- Number of micrographs collected (500)
- Number of high-quality micrographs selected (333)
- Number of particles picked (~55,000)
- Number of particles in the final stack (~14,000)
- Glow-discharged holey grids
- Leginon software for data collection
- MotionCorr2 for movie frame alignment
- CTFFIND4 for defocus estimation
- DOG in Appion for particle picking
- Relion 2 for 2D and 3D classification
- EMAN2 for initial model generation
- Positive control: Not explicitly mentioned.
- Negative control: Not explicitly mentioned.
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!