Continuous metabolic syndrome severity z scores at baseline were calculated for participants using sex- and race-based formulas. As described elsewhere [7 (link), 8 (link)], these scores were derived using a confirmatory factor analysis approach for the five traditional metabolic syndrome components (WC, triacylglycerol, HDL-cholesterol, systolic BP, fasting glucose) to determine the weighted contribution of each component to a latent metabolic syndrome ’factor’ on a sex- and race/ethnicity-specific basis. Confirmatory factor analysis was performed among adults aged 20–64 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey with categorisation into six subgroups based on sex and race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic). For each of these six population subgroups, loading coefficients for the five metabolic syndrome components were transformed into a single metabolic syndrome factor and used to generate equations to calculate a standardised metabolic syndrome severity score for each subgroup (
Metabolic Syndrome Severity Scoring
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol.
The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Corresponding Organization : University of Virginia
Other organizations : University of Florida, Johns Hopkins University, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson Memorial Hospital
Protocol cited in 14 other protocols
Variable analysis
- None explicitly mentioned
- Continuous metabolic syndrome severity z scores at baseline
- Presence of metabolic syndrome (defined as 3 or more of the following criteria: elevated waist circumference, elevated fasting triacylglycerol, reduced HDL-cholesterol, elevated blood pressure, elevated fasting blood glucose)
- Race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic)
- None explicitly mentioned
- None explicitly mentioned
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!