Evaluating Mosquito Attractants in Huts
Corresponding Organization :
Other organizations : University of Nairobi, Ifakara Health Institute, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, Durham University, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Wageningen University & Research, Cornell University
Protocol cited in 18 other protocols
Variable analysis
- Presence or absence of the synthetic blend
- Number of mosquitoes of different taxa entering the experimental huts and trapped
- Single human volunteers sleeping under non-insecticidal bed-nets
- Positions of the blend and the light traps in the experimental huts
- Rotation of the synthetic blend between the huts every night
- Duration of mosquito trapping (7.00pm to 7.00am)
- Positive control: Experimental huts with the synthetic blend
- Negative control: Experimental huts with a blank unbaited MM-X® instead of the synthetic blend
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!