The QTLdb accepts either curated public data from journal papers or private laboratory reports subject to publication. More than 50 parameters/data types are subject to collection to describe a QTL, as reported earlier (3 ). We have recently added a number of new data types to enhance our ability to be more inclusive in QTL/association data collection. These new types include ‘association’ data for candidate gene or single marker associations; ‘eQTL’ from microarray-based QTL scan analysis; ‘test scale’ to differentiate genome-wise, chromosome-wise, comparison-wise and experiment-wise QTL/association reports; ‘test model’ to indicate epistatic or maternally or paternally imprinted QTL; new test statistics such as Bayes value and likelihood ratio, etc. We have also added animal breed information for future breed-associated QTL analysis. The backbone maps to record QTL are from USDA-Meat Animal Research Center (MARC; for pigs and cattle), Wageningen University (for chicken), University of Melbourne (for sheep) and the National Center for Cool and Cold Water Aquaculture (NCCCWA; for rainbow trout). Reported QTL genome locations were obtained by interpolating their linkage map positions via anchor markers. QTL are mapping features recorded as linkage distances. In order for GBrowse to display QTL and for users to easily port QTL data for customized analysis, we established a process to convert the QTL linkage map locations (centimorgan, cM) to the corresponding physical locations (megabase pair, Mbp). The data conversion is a mathematical process built in a Perl script, whereby interpolation or extrapolation is performed with reference to the nearest common anchoring marker locations on both maps. The QTLdb has a three-tiered data curation structure so that curators, editors and database administrators can work together and share responsibilities in a workflow to ensure data quality and smooth process control. In the past few years, a set of new data debugging tools, process control mechanisms and functions for the ease of use of the tools have been developed in response to lessons learned during data curation and debugging.
Partial Protocol Preview
This section provides a glimpse into the protocol. The remaining content is hidden due to licensing restrictions, but the full text is available at the following link:
Access Free Full Text.
Hu Z.L., Park C.A., Wu X.L, & Reecy J.M. (2012). Animal QTLdb: an improved database tool for livestock animal QTL/association data dissemination in the post-genome era. Nucleic Acids Research, 41(Database issue), D871-D879.
Association data for candidate gene or single marker associations
EQTL from microarray-based QTL scan analysis
Test scale (genome-wise, chromosome-wise, comparison-wise, and experiment-wise QTL/association reports)
Test model (epistatic, maternally or paternally imprinted QTL)
Test statistics (Bayes value, likelihood ratio)
dependent variables
QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci)
Animal breed information for future breed-associated QTL analysis
control variables
Backbone maps to record QTL (USDA-MARC for pigs and cattle, Wageningen University for chicken, University of Melbourne for sheep, and NCCCWA for rainbow trout)
Annotations
Based on most similar protocols
Etiam vel ipsum. Morbi facilisis vestibulum nisl. Praesent cursus laoreet felis. Integer adipiscing pretium orci. Nulla facilisi. Quisque posuere bibendum purus. Nulla quam mauris, cursus eget, convallis ac, molestie non, enim. Aliquam congue. Quisque sagittis nonummy sapien. Proin molestie sem vitae urna. Maecenas lorem.
As authors may omit details in methods from publication, our AI will look for missing critical information across the 5 most similar protocols.
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to
get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required